In an age where our devices buzz, beep, and flash with endless notifications, it’s tempting to trust at face value. A text claims your package is delayed. An email warns your bank account is locked. A call demands payment for unpaid taxes. But what if we treated every one of these with unrelenting suspicion? Welcome to the “Zero Trust Human” theory—a mindset that demands verification before action, especially as AI hacks in 2025 make deception smarter than ever.
What Is Zero Trust Human?
Inspired by the cybersecurity principle of “Zero Trust"—where no system or user is trusted until proven safe—Zero Trust Human flips the script for our daily digital lives. Every notification, email, or call is a potential imposter until you confirm its legitimacy. This isn’t paranoia; it’s survival. In 2025, AI-driven scams are no longer clunky phishing emails with obvious typos—they’re hyper-personalized, voice-cloned, and generated at scale, thanks to breakthroughs like generative AI agents and multimodal models.
Why We Need It Now More Than Ever
Our instinct to trust is a relic of a pre-digital world, but 2025’s threat landscape exploits it mercilessly. The Federal Trade Commission reported $10 billion lost to fraud in 2023, and that number’s only climbing as AI supercharges cybercriminals. Studies show 94% of malware still sneaks in via email, but now it’s paired with AI tricks like deepfake audio calls or video messages mimicking your boss. The Picus Labs Red Report 2025 found no massive surge in fully AI-driven attacks yet, but adversaries are already using tools like FraudGPT to craft convincing lures faster than humans can spot them. Beyond scams, misinformation—fake delivery updates, spoofed emergencies—wastes time and frays nerves. Zero Trust Human is your shield.
How to Live the Zero Trust Human Life in 2025
Here’s how to stay ahead of the curve, blending timeless vigilance with defenses against the latest AI hacks:
Pause Before You Click: That "PayPal” email with a slick link? Hover over the sender (no clicking) to spot fakes—2025’s AI can mimic domains like paypa1.com with ease. Log into official sites directly instead. Multimodal AI models now generate flawless visuals too, so don’t trust polished graphics alone. Call Back on Your Terms: A voicemail claims your Social Security number is compromised? Don’t dial their number. AI voice cloning in 2025 can replicate anyone—your mom, your bank rep—using just seconds of audio scraped from social media. Use a verified contact from the official source. Cross-Check Notifications: Text says your Amazon order’s delayed? Don’t click the link—open the app yourself. AI agents can now chain low-severity exploits (like a fake SMS) into full-blown account takeovers, per Hadrian’s 2025 hacker predictions. Use Two-Factor Skepticism: A text from “your friend” begging for cash? Call them to confirm. IBM’s 2023 data showed AI saves $1.76 million per breach by speeding detection—flip that: hackers use it to accelerate attacks. Verify across channels. Assume Spoofing—and Deepfakes: Caller ID says it’s your sibling? Could be a cloned number or an AI-generated voice. MIT Technology Review notes 2025’s generative AI can churn out virtual worlds and fake Zoom calls indistinguishable from reality. Answer warily or let it hit voicemail. 2025 AI Hacks to Watch Out For
This year, AI’s not just a tool—it’s a weapon. Here’s what’s new in the hacker playbook, straight from trends like those in MIT’s 2025 Breakthrough Technologies and Hadrian’s predictions:
Agentic AI Scams: Autonomous AI agents don’t just send phishing emails—they adapt in real-time, tailoring messages based on your replies. Imagine a “bank rep” that knows your recent transactions—pulled from public data or prior breaches. Multimodal Deepfakes: Forget text-only fakes. Hackers now blend text, audio, and video—like a “video call” from your CEO demanding a wire transfer. Microsoft warns these are getting harder to spot without forensic tools. Search Engine Manipulation: Subdomain takeovers rank phishing sites atop Google results. Search “your bank login” and the top hit might be a trap, optimized by AI to outsmart traditional SEO defenses. The Mindset Shift
Zero Trust Human isn’t about distrusting people—it’s about doubting the tech. Your bank won’t care if you double-check their email via their app. Your friend won’t mind a “Did you send this?” text. Only scammers lose. In 2025, with AI reasoning models like OpenAI’s o3 outpacing human problem-solving (per the AI Safety Report), skepticism is your edge. It’s also a power grab— you decide what’s worth your time, not some algorithm.
Challenges and Balance
Verification takes effort, and 2025’s pace doesn’t slow down. AI-powered SOCs (Security Operations Centers) cut response times—great for pros, but hackers use similar tech to strike faster. Over-skepticism might delay a real emergency, so prioritize high-stakes stuff: money, logins, personal data. Low-risk pings? Let ‘em wait.
The Bigger Picture
Zero Trust Human is a rebellion against a world where AI blurs truth and trickery. Companies must expect us to verify—make it easy with clear channels. We should demand systems that don’t let agentic AI run wild or let deepfakes hijack our trust. In 2025, as AI hacks evolve from experimental (small-scale AI exploit frameworks, per Hadrian) to mainstream, skepticism isn’t just smart—it’s essential.
Next time your phone pings, channel your Zero Trust Human. Don’t trust it. Prove it. In a digital maze of AI mirrors, it’s your superpower.
EDITORIAL
written: March 3, 2025
EDITORIAL
written: March 14, 2025
In the past year, several major security breaches were traced back to basic failures in privileged account management. Weak controls on admin-level accounts – from not using multi-factor authentication (MFA) to poor password hygiene – have proven to be low-hanging fruit for attackers. Microsoft reports that over 99.9% of compromised accounts lacked MFA, making them easy targets for password attacks (Security at your organization - Multifactor authentication (MFA) statistics - Partner Center | Microsoft Learn). The incidents below show how such oversights led to serious consequences, and how stricter controls could have prevented the damage. This is a wake-up call for executives: reducing your attack surface by locking down admin access isn’t just IT best practice – it’s vital business protection.
An Orphaned Admin Account Leads to a State Government Breach
One recent breach at a U.S. state government agency started with an administrator account of a former employee that was never deactivated. Attackers obtained the ex-employee’s credentials (likely via a leak from a prior breach) and used them to log in through the agency’s VPN – no MFA was required, so a password alone let them in (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account) (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account). Once inside, the hackers discovered that this old admin account still had broad access, including to a SharePoint server where another set of admin credentials was stored in plaintext. Using those, they gained domain administrator privileges over on-premises and cloud systems (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account). In short, one forgotten account opened the door to the entire network.
The consequences were severe. The intruders accessed internal directories and documents containing host and user information, and ultimately posted sensitive data on a dark web marketplace (Top Data Breaches in 2024 [Month-wise] - Strobes). The breach forced an incident response involving state and federal cyber agencies. Fortunately, the attackers did not pivot into the most sensitive cloud systems in this case, but the reputational damage and potential exposure of citizen data were already done. This incident could have been prevented with basic hygiene: promptly disabling departed employees’ accounts, enforcing MFA on VPN/admin logins, and never storing admin passwords in unsecure places. CISA’s advisory on this attack emphasized exactly these points, urging organizations to “remove and disable accounts…no longer needed,” “enable and enforce MFA,” and “store credentials in a secure manner” (Threat Actor Leverages Compromised Account of Former Employee to Access State Government Organization | CISA). In other words, had the agency practiced strict off-boarding and privileged credential management, this breach might never have happened.
Ransomware via Missing MFA at a Healthcare Provider
In February 2024, healthcare IT giant Change Healthcare (a subsidiary of UnitedHealth) suffered a massive ransomware attack that disrupted services across U.S. hospitals and insurers (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). How did it happen? Attackers from the BlackCat (ALPHV) gang used stolen employee credentials to log into the company’s Citrix remote access portal, which did not have MFA enabled (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). In other words, a critical admin gateway was protected only by a password – one the hackers already had from prior data theft malware. With that single factor, the adversaries remotely authenticated as a valid user and immediately sprang deeper into the network.
What followed was nine days of unchecked roaming in the IT environment. Once inside, the attackers moved laterally through systems, quietly exfiltrating about 6 TB of data and ultimately deploying ransomware that brought operations to a standstill (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). The impact was enormous: key healthcare services (payment processing, prescription systems, claims platforms) went down, affecting providers and patients nationwide, and the company estimates $872 million in financial damages (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). UnitedHealth ultimately paid a ransom (reportedly $22 million) (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA) to regain control, and had to replace thousands of computers and rebuild its data center from scratch in the aftermath (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). This nightmare scenario began from a single missing control – MFA – on an admin remote access point. Had a one-time code or push approval been required, the stolen password alone would have been useless to the attacker, likely thwarting the intrusion at the outset. This case underscores that any externally accessible admin tool must be gated with strong authentication; otherwise, it’s an open invitation to hackers.
Stolen Credentials Exploit Weak Cloud Account Controls
Even cutting-edge cloud platforms are not immune to old-school security lapses. In mid-2024, data warehousing firm Snowflake found itself at the center of a multi-organization breach campaign due to customers not enforcing MFA on their Snowflake user accounts (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency). Attackers (eventually linked to the ShinyHunters group) leveraged login credentials stolen via malware as far back as 2020 to access Snowflake accounts at 165 different companies (Public breaches from identity attacks in 2024). Because many of those usernames and passwords had never been changed or secured with MFA, the hackers could simply log in to each target’s cloud data environment with valid credentials. Snowflake’s own systems weren’t breached per se – instead, the attackers piggybacked on weak customer account security.
The fallout was widespread. Major enterprises like Ticketmaster, Advance Auto Parts, and Santander Bank were reportedly among the victims (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency) (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency). In total, data on roughly 500 million customers was exposed (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency), ranging from personal information to possibly financial or ticketing records, depending on the company. Some of this stolen data appeared for sale on criminal forums for six-figure prices, and at least one telecom victim paid a ransom to prevent leaks (Public breaches from identity attacks in 2024). Beyond the immediate privacy breach, affected companies faced regulatory scrutiny and loss of customer trust. All of this stemmed from a preventable weakness: allowing critical cloud accounts to operate without enforced MFA or routine password updates. Snowflake’s documentation at the time noted that users had to opt-in to MFA on their own (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency) – a policy gap that has since been widely criticized. This incident has fueled an industry push to mandate MFA for cloud services and to implement checks so that long-dormant or non-compliant accounts can’t be the source of such a breach. Simply put, strong authentication and password management on third-party platforms are just as important as on your in-house systems.
Even Tech Giants Are Not Immune (Microsoft’s MFA Lesson)
If any company understands cybersecurity, it’s Microsoft – yet an oversight with a privileged account led to an embarrassing incident for them as well. In late 2023, a legacy “test” Azure AD account in Microsoft’s corporate network was left without MFA protection and got compromised via a basic password-spraying attack (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). The Kremlin-linked hacking group APT29 (aka “Midnight Blizzard”/Cozy Bear) simply guessed a weak password on this account, which was an admin tenant account that hadn’t been updated to modern security policies. With that foothold, the attackers elevated their access by exploiting OAuth permissions – essentially tricking the system into giving them a token with full access to Exchange Online mailboxes (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). Through this, they quietly read the emails of various Microsoft employees, including some senior executives (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). Even more alarming, Microsoft later revealed that the hackers used information gleaned from those emails to further infiltrate and access some internal source code repositories and systems (Microsoft Confirms Russian Hackers Stole Source Code, Some Customer Secrets).
For Microsoft, the incident was a PR black eye: a nation-state actor rifled through sensitive company communications and intellectual property. While the company says no customer data was compromised, the attackers potentially obtained authentication tokens, API keys, and other “secrets” from emails that could be weaponized (Microsoft Confirms Russian Hackers Stole Source Code, Some Customer Secrets) (Microsoft Confirms Russian Hackers Stole Source Code, Some Customer Secrets). Microsoft had to notify over 100 affected external organizations that corresponded with those breached email accounts (Public breaches from identity attacks in 2024). The root cause was plainly acknowledged: the test account did not have multifactor authentication enabled (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). Microsoft noted that if the same scenario occurred today, their policies would require MFA on such accounts by default (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). This case drives home that even one forgotten high-privilege account can undermine an entire security program. It’s a lesson to every enterprise: no account is too minor to secure, and “legacy” or service accounts deserve the same protections as primary accounts – otherwise they become the weakest link.
Reducing the Attack Surface: Key Lessons for Executives
The stories above may span different industries – government, healthcare, cloud services, tech – but they share common failure points. In each case, a privileged or admin-level account was left inadequately protected, providing attackers an easy initial entry. The damage ranged from multimillion-dollar ransomware incidents to massive data breaches and espionage. The good news is that these attacks were not unstoppable super-hacks; they were preventable with well-known best practices. To avoid being the next victim, executives should ensure their organizations take the following steps to harden privileged accounts and shrink the attack surface:
By executing on these key actions, organizations can dramatically reduce the odds that a single password or admin account will be the domino that topples their defenses. The cost of implementing strong authentication and access controls is far less than the cost of cleaning up a breach.
Conclusion
High-profile breaches in the last year make one thing clear: privileged account management is a business-critical issue. When an admin account is compromised due to weak controls, attackers gain the “keys to the kingdom” and the fallout can hit finances, operations, and reputation hard. Conversely, companies that proactively tighten their controls – enforcing MFA, using strong unique credentials, minimizing admin access, and protecting those credentials – are far less likely to become a headline for the wrong reasons. As an executive, championing these measures is not just supporting IT best practices, it’s safeguarding the entire enterprise. The incidents we’ve discussed are sobering, but they also highlight a hopeful message: with the right controls in place, these breaches were avoidable. Reducing your attack surface today means fewer fires to fight tomorrow. It’s time to ensure that your organization’s most powerful accounts are also its most secure.
Sources:
In today's digital age, protecting your online identity and personal information has become more crucial than ever. Cyber threats are continually evolving, and one of the most effective ways to safeguard yourself against these risks is by practicing excellent password hygiene. Here's why it matters and what steps you can take to ensure your passwords are strong and secure.
Why Password Hygiene Matters
Every day, cybercriminals attempt to exploit weak passwords to gain unauthorized access to sensitive personal, financial, and professional information. According to Verizon’s 2023 Data Breach Investigations Report, compromised passwords account for 81% of hacking-related breaches. Poor password practices can lead to identity theft, financial losses, and even damage to your reputation. Adopting robust password habits drastically reduces your vulnerability and helps ensure your digital safety.
Essential Password Hygiene Practices
1. Regularly Change Your Passwords
The Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recommends periodically updating passwords—every three to six months—to reduce the likelihood of breaches due to compromised credentials.
2. Minimum 15-Character Passwords
According to research from Microsoft, passwords with 15 or more characters significantly increase the difficulty for automated tools to crack passwords, making longer passwords exponentially more secure than shorter ones.
3. Avoid Using Personal Details
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) advises against using easily guessable personal details such as birthdays, anniversaries, pet names, or addresses in passwords, as cybercriminals often harvest these details from social media profiles.
4. Unique Passwords for Every Login
According to a Google study, 52% of users reuse the same password across multiple accounts. This practice significantly increases vulnerability, as one compromised account can expose all others.
5. Leverage a Password Manager
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) advocates using password managers, as these tools help generate strong, unique passwords and securely store your login information, greatly simplifying password management while enhancing security.
Conclusion
Adopting robust password hygiene isn't merely a recommendation; it's essential in our increasingly interconnected world. Regularly updating passwords, using complex and lengthy passwords, avoiding personal details, creating unique passwords for every login, and employing a password manager can significantly enhance your digital security.
Protect your digital identity today—make excellent password hygiene a non-negotiable part of your online life.
EDITORIAL
written: March 18, 2025
In today’s digital age, artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly mainstream, shaping everything from how we search online to how we interact with technology daily. However, as AI grows more prevalent, concerns about privacy, particularly regarding personally identifiable information (PII), have emerged as critical issues that users must understand.
Mainstream AI tools, such as conversational AI assistants (e.g., ChatGPT, Google Bard) and generative AI platforms (e.g., Midjourney, DALL-E), rely heavily on data gathered from the internet. These AI models are trained using massive datasets, including text from websites, social media, forums, and publicly available records. For instance, Clearview AI, a facial recognition startup, was trained using billions of images scraped from social media and websites, raising significant privacy concerns (Source: The New York Times, 2020).
Consequently, each interaction users have with AI—each query, request, or conversation—can potentially become part of future training datasets. In 2023, a significant privacy incident occurred when Samsung employees unintentionally leaked proprietary company information by inputting sensitive corporate data into ChatGPT, demonstrating how easily private information can become vulnerable (Source: TechCrunch, 2023).
When users input personally identifiable information (names, addresses, phone numbers, emails, or sensitive details like financial or health information), they risk embedding their private data within AI’s expansive dataset. This data could inadvertently resurface in future interactions, leading to unintended privacy breaches or misuse.
Moreover, mainstream AI companies typically retain user queries to refine their models continuously. Even when anonymization is promised, the depth and specificity of personal data in user queries can sometimes defeat anonymization techniques, especially when aggregated with vast amounts of additional information available online.
The risks of sharing PII with AI include:
Identity Theft: Unintended exposure of sensitive personal data can make individuals vulnerable to identity theft or targeted phishing attacks.
Data Misuse and Breaches: Once personal data becomes embedded in AI datasets, the potential for misuse by third parties or exposure through security breaches dramatically increases.
Loss of Control Over Personal Data: Users may unknowingly relinquish control of their information once entered into an AI query, losing the ability to manage or delete it effectively.
Zero Trust Identity Best Practices
Integrating zero trust principles into your AI interactions can significantly enhance privacy and security. Zero trust is a security framework that requires continuous verification, explicitly validating every interaction, and minimizing access privileges.
Here are detailed zero trust identity best practices users and organizations can follow:
Enforce Continuous Authentication:
Utilize advanced methods such as adaptive authentication, biometrics, or behavioral analytics to continuously verify user identities.
Example: Companies like Okta and Duo Security offer adaptive authentication that evaluates contextual signals such as location, device health, and behavior patterns (Source: Gartner, 2022).
Least Privilege Access:
Limit access rights strictly to necessary resources required for each interaction, minimizing exposure.
Example: Microsoft Azure’s Conditional Access policies restrict user access based on defined conditions, significantly lowering risk (Source: Microsoft, 2023).
Micro-Segmentation:
Divide resources into isolated segments to limit lateral movement if an account is compromised.
Example: VMware’s NSX platform applies micro-segmentation to ensure network isolation and reduced risk exposure in case of breaches (Source: VMware, 2023).
Monitor and Audit Regularly:
Continuously monitor and log all AI interactions, regularly auditing logs to identify unusual patterns or breaches.
Example: Splunk’s platform provides robust log management and real-time analytics to detect suspicious activities (Source: Splunk, 2023).
Implement Strong Identity Governance:
Establish rigorous identity governance practices, clearly defining and managing user roles, permissions, and lifecycle.
Example: SailPoint offers comprehensive identity governance solutions ensuring accurate role assignments and controlled user access (Source: SailPoint, 2023).
To mitigate these risks and securely leverage AI, users should integrate both personal privacy practices and zero trust principles into their regular online interactions. Understanding how AI models are trained, the implications of sharing personal data, and proactively adopting these protective measures will enable individuals and organizations to enjoy the benefits of AI without compromising their security.
EDITORIAL:
written: March 30, 2025
© Copyright 2025. All rights reserved.
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.