Zero Trust Human: Never Trust a Ping Without the Proof

In an age where our devices buzz, beep, and flash with endless notifications, it’s tempting to trust at face value. A text claims your package is delayed. An email warns your bank account is locked. A call demands payment for unpaid taxes. But what if we treated every one of these with unrelenting suspicion? Welcome to the “Zero Trust Human” theory—a mindset that demands verification before action, especially as AI hacks in 2025 make deception smarter than ever.

 

What Is Zero Trust Human?

 

Inspired by the cybersecurity principle of “Zero Trust"—where no system or user is trusted until proven safe—Zero Trust Human flips the script for our daily digital lives. Every notification, email, or call is a potential imposter until you confirm its legitimacy. This isn’t paranoia; it’s survival. In 2025, AI-driven scams are no longer clunky phishing emails with obvious typos—they’re hyper-personalized, voice-cloned, and generated at scale, thanks to breakthroughs like generative AI agents and multimodal models.

 

Why We Need It Now More Than Ever

 

Our instinct to trust is a relic of a pre-digital world, but 2025’s threat landscape exploits it mercilessly. The Federal Trade Commission reported $10 billion lost to fraud in 2023, and that number’s only climbing as AI supercharges cybercriminals. Studies show 94% of malware still sneaks in via email, but now it’s paired with AI tricks like deepfake audio calls or video messages mimicking your boss. The Picus Labs Red Report 2025 found no massive surge in fully AI-driven attacks yet, but adversaries are already using tools like FraudGPT to craft convincing lures faster than humans can spot them. Beyond scams, misinformation—fake delivery updates, spoofed emergencies—wastes time and frays nerves. Zero Trust Human is your shield.

 

How to Live the Zero Trust Human Life in 2025

 

Here’s how to stay ahead of the curve, blending timeless vigilance with defenses against the latest AI hacks:

Pause Before You Click: That "PayPal” email with a slick link? Hover over the sender (no clicking) to spot fakes—2025’s AI can mimic domains like paypa1.com with ease. Log into official sites directly instead. Multimodal AI models now generate flawless visuals too, so don’t trust polished graphics alone. Call Back on Your Terms: A voicemail claims your Social Security number is compromised? Don’t dial their number. AI voice cloning in 2025 can replicate anyone—your mom, your bank rep—using just seconds of audio scraped from social media. Use a verified contact from the official source. Cross-Check Notifications: Text says your Amazon order’s delayed? Don’t click the link—open the app yourself. AI agents can now chain low-severity exploits (like a fake SMS) into full-blown account takeovers, per Hadrian’s 2025 hacker predictions. Use Two-Factor Skepticism: A text from “your friend” begging for cash? Call them to confirm. IBM’s 2023 data showed AI saves $1.76 million per breach by speeding detection—flip that: hackers use it to accelerate attacks. Verify across channels. Assume Spoofing—and Deepfakes: Caller ID says it’s your sibling? Could be a cloned number or an AI-generated voice. MIT Technology Review notes 2025’s generative AI can churn out virtual worlds and fake Zoom calls indistinguishable from reality. Answer warily or let it hit voicemail. 2025 AI Hacks to Watch Out For

This year, AI’s not just a tool—it’s a weapon. Here’s what’s new in the hacker playbook, straight from trends like those in MIT’s 2025 Breakthrough Technologies and Hadrian’s predictions:

Agentic AI Scams: Autonomous AI agents don’t just send phishing emails—they adapt in real-time, tailoring messages based on your replies. Imagine a “bank rep” that knows your recent transactions—pulled from public data or prior breaches. Multimodal Deepfakes: Forget text-only fakes. Hackers now blend text, audio, and video—like a “video call” from your CEO demanding a wire transfer. Microsoft warns these are getting harder to spot without forensic tools. Search Engine Manipulation: Subdomain takeovers rank phishing sites atop Google results. Search “your bank login” and the top hit might be a trap, optimized by AI to outsmart traditional SEO defenses. The Mindset Shift

Zero Trust Human isn’t about distrusting people—it’s about doubting the tech. Your bank won’t care if you double-check their email via their app. Your friend won’t mind a “Did you send this?” text. Only scammers lose. In 2025, with AI reasoning models like OpenAI’s o3 outpacing human problem-solving (per the AI Safety Report), skepticism is your edge. It’s also a power grab— you decide what’s worth your time, not some algorithm.

 

Challenges and Balance

 

Verification takes effort, and 2025’s pace doesn’t slow down. AI-powered SOCs (Security Operations Centers) cut response times—great for pros, but hackers use similar tech to strike faster. Over-skepticism might delay a real emergency, so prioritize high-stakes stuff: money, logins, personal data. Low-risk pings? Let ‘em wait.

 

The Bigger Picture

 

Zero Trust Human is a rebellion against a world where AI blurs truth and trickery. Companies must expect us to verify—make it easy with clear channels. We should demand systems that don’t let agentic AI run wild or let deepfakes hijack our trust. In 2025, as AI hacks evolve from experimental (small-scale AI exploit frameworks, per Hadrian) to mainstream, skepticism isn’t just smart—it’s essential.

Next time your phone pings, channel your Zero Trust Human. Don’t trust it. Prove it. In a digital maze of AI mirrors, it’s your superpower.

EDITORIAL

written: March 3, 2025

The High Cost of Poor Privileged Account Management

EDITORIAL

written: March 14, 2025

In the past year, several major security breaches were traced back to basic failures in privileged account management. Weak controls on admin-level accounts – from not using multi-factor authentication (MFA) to poor password hygiene – have proven to be low-hanging fruit for attackers. Microsoft reports that over 99.9% of compromised accounts lacked MFA, making them easy targets for password attacks (Security at your organization - Multifactor authentication (MFA) statistics - Partner Center | Microsoft Learn). The incidents below show how such oversights led to serious consequences, and how stricter controls could have prevented the damage. This is a wake-up call for executives: reducing your attack surface by locking down admin access isn’t just IT best practice – it’s vital business protection.

 

An Orphaned Admin Account Leads to a State Government Breach

 

One recent breach at a U.S. state government agency started with an administrator account of a former employee that was never deactivated. Attackers obtained the ex-employee’s credentials (likely via a leak from a prior breach) and used them to log in through the agency’s VPN – no MFA was required, so a password alone let them in (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account) (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account). Once inside, the hackers discovered that this old admin account still had broad access, including to a SharePoint server where another set of admin credentials was stored in plaintext. Using those, they gained domain administrator privileges over on-premises and cloud systems (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account). In short, one forgotten account opened the door to the entire network.

 

The consequences were severe. The intruders accessed internal directories and documents containing host and user information, and ultimately posted sensitive data on a dark web marketplace (Top Data Breaches in 2024 [Month-wise] - Strobes). The breach forced an incident response involving state and federal cyber agencies. Fortunately, the attackers did not pivot into the most sensitive cloud systems in this case, but the reputational damage and potential exposure of citizen data were already done. This incident could have been prevented with basic hygiene: promptly disabling departed employees’ accounts, enforcing MFA on VPN/admin logins, and never storing admin passwords in unsecure places. CISA’s advisory on this attack emphasized exactly these points, urging organizations to “remove and disable accounts…no longer needed,” “enable and enforce MFA,” and “store credentials in a secure manner” (Threat Actor Leverages Compromised Account of Former Employee to Access State Government Organization | CISA). In other words, had the agency practiced strict off-boarding and privileged credential management, this breach might never have happened.

 

Ransomware via Missing MFA at a Healthcare Provider

 

In February 2024, healthcare IT giant Change Healthcare (a subsidiary of UnitedHealth) suffered a massive ransomware attack that disrupted services across U.S. hospitals and insurers (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). How did it happen? Attackers from the BlackCat (ALPHV) gang used stolen employee credentials to log into the company’s Citrix remote access portal, which did not have MFA enabled (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). In other words, a critical admin gateway was protected only by a password – one the hackers already had from prior data theft malware. With that single factor, the adversaries remotely authenticated as a valid user and immediately sprang deeper into the network.

 

What followed was nine days of unchecked roaming in the IT environment. Once inside, the attackers moved laterally through systems, quietly exfiltrating about 6 TB of data and ultimately deploying ransomware that brought operations to a standstill (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). The impact was enormous: key healthcare services (payment processing, prescription systems, claims platforms) went down, affecting providers and patients nationwide, and the company estimates $872 million in financial damages (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). UnitedHealth ultimately paid a ransom (reportedly $22 million) (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA) to regain control, and had to replace thousands of computers and rebuild its data center from scratch in the aftermath (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA). This nightmare scenario began from a single missing control – MFA – on an admin remote access point. Had a one-time code or push approval been required, the stolen password alone would have been useless to the attacker, likely thwarting the intrusion at the outset. This case underscores that any externally accessible admin tool must be gated with strong authentication; otherwise, it’s an open invitation to hackers.

 

Stolen Credentials Exploit Weak Cloud Account Controls

 

Even cutting-edge cloud platforms are not immune to old-school security lapses. In mid-2024, data warehousing firm Snowflake found itself at the center of a multi-organization breach campaign due to customers not enforcing MFA on their Snowflake user accounts (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency). Attackers (eventually linked to the ShinyHunters group) leveraged login credentials stolen via malware as far back as 2020 to access Snowflake accounts at 165 different companies (Public breaches from identity attacks in 2024). Because many of those usernames and passwords had never been changed or secured with MFA, the hackers could simply log in to each target’s cloud data environment with valid credentials. Snowflake’s own systems weren’t breached per se – instead, the attackers piggybacked on weak customer account security.

 

The fallout was widespread. Major enterprises like Ticketmaster, Advance Auto Parts, and Santander Bank were reportedly among the victims (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency) (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency). In total, data on roughly 500 million customers was exposed (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency), ranging from personal information to possibly financial or ticketing records, depending on the company. Some of this stolen data appeared for sale on criminal forums for six-figure prices, and at least one telecom victim paid a ransom to prevent leaks (Public breaches from identity attacks in 2024). Beyond the immediate privacy breach, affected companies faced regulatory scrutiny and loss of customer trust. All of this stemmed from a preventable weakness: allowing critical cloud accounts to operate without enforced MFA or routine password updates. Snowflake’s documentation at the time noted that users had to opt-in to MFA on their own (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency) – a policy gap that has since been widely criticized. This incident has fueled an industry push to mandate MFA for cloud services and to implement checks so that long-dormant or non-compliant accounts can’t be the source of such a breach. Simply put, strong authentication and password management on third-party platforms are just as important as on your in-house systems.

 

Even Tech Giants Are Not Immune (Microsoft’s MFA Lesson)

 

If any company understands cybersecurity, it’s Microsoft – yet an oversight with a privileged account led to an embarrassing incident for them as well. In late 2023, a legacy “test” Azure AD account in Microsoft’s corporate network was left without MFA protection and got compromised via a basic password-spraying attack (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). The Kremlin-linked hacking group APT29 (aka “Midnight Blizzard”/Cozy Bear) simply guessed a weak password on this account, which was an admin tenant account that hadn’t been updated to modern security policies. With that foothold, the attackers elevated their access by exploiting OAuth permissions – essentially tricking the system into giving them a token with full access to Exchange Online mailboxes (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). Through this, they quietly read the emails of various Microsoft employees, including some senior executives (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). Even more alarming, Microsoft later revealed that the hackers used information gleaned from those emails to further infiltrate and access some internal source code repositories and systems (Microsoft Confirms Russian Hackers Stole Source Code, Some Customer Secrets).

 

For Microsoft, the incident was a PR black eye: a nation-state actor rifled through sensitive company communications and intellectual property. While the company says no customer data was compromised, the attackers potentially obtained authentication tokens, API keys, and other “secrets” from emails that could be weaponized (Microsoft Confirms Russian Hackers Stole Source Code, Some Customer Secrets) (Microsoft Confirms Russian Hackers Stole Source Code, Some Customer Secrets). Microsoft had to notify over 100 affected external organizations that corresponded with those breached email accounts (Public breaches from identity attacks in 2024). The root cause was plainly acknowledged: the test account did not have multifactor authentication enabled (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). Microsoft noted that if the same scenario occurred today, their policies would require MFA on such accounts by default (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget). This case drives home that even one forgotten high-privilege account can undermine an entire security program. It’s a lesson to every enterprise: no account is too minor to secure, and “legacy” or service accounts deserve the same protections as primary accounts – otherwise they become the weakest link.

 

Reducing the Attack Surface: Key Lessons for Executives

 

The stories above may span different industries – government, healthcare, cloud services, tech – but they share common failure points. In each case, a privileged or admin-level account was left inadequately protected, providing attackers an easy initial entry. The damage ranged from multimillion-dollar ransomware incidents to massive data breaches and espionage. The good news is that these attacks were not unstoppable super-hacks; they were preventable with well-known best practices. To avoid being the next victim, executives should ensure their organizations take the following steps to harden privileged accounts and shrink the attack surface:

 

  • Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication Everywhere: Require MFA for all admin and remote access accounts (and ideally all user logins). A second authentication factor would have derailed most of the breaches above. In fact, over 99% of account hacks can be prevented by MFA (Security at your organization - Multifactor authentication (MFA) statistics - Partner Center | Microsoft Learn). Make sure this covers not just employees but also third-party services and legacy accounts. MFA is one of the cheapest, highest-impact defenses available.
  • Harden Password Policies and Eliminate Weak Credentials: Too often, administrators still use weak, default, or reused passwords. One analysis found over 40,000 admin accounts using “admin” as the password in 2023 () – an open door for attackers. Institute strong password requirements (length and complexity) and check new passwords against breach databases to block known leaks. Never reuse passwords across systems, especially for privileged users, and enforce regular rotation or retirement of credentials to mitigate the risk from old leaks. Better yet, consider password managers or moving toward passwordless auth for admins to reduce human error.
  • Limit Admin Account Use and Privileges: Each admin or root account is a high-value target. Reduce their number and scope. Implement the principle of least privilege – admins should have access only to what they absolutely need. Likewise, administrators should use separate non-privileged accounts for email, web browsing, and day-to-day work. This way, if a phishing email or malware attack strikes a regular user inbox, it won’t immediately compromise domain-wide credentials. By segmenting roles and using temporary elevation (just-in-time access) for sensitive tasks, you dramatically cut down the risk that one set of stolen credentials can crater your whole organization.
  • Secure Storage of Credentials: Establish strict policies for how credentials, especially admin passwords and keys, are stored and shared. They should never be stored in plain text on servers, documents, wikis, or email. Use secure credential vaults or privileged access management (PAM) solutions (Threat Actor Leverages Compromised Account of Former Employee to Access State Government Organization | CISA) that enforce encryption, rotation, and controlled access. In the state government breach, an admin password was found on a SharePoint server (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account) – equivalent to leaving the keys under the doormat. Don’t let convenience undermine security: invest in proper secret storage and require admins to use it.
  • Rigorous Offboarding and Monitoring: Make account deprovisioning a non-negotiable part of your employee exit process. Dormant accounts (especially with high privileges) should be disabled immediately when personnel leave or roles change. Regularly audit your Active Directory, cloud tenant, and other systems for accounts that haven’t been used in months or belong to former staff (Threat Actor Leverages Compromised Account of Former Employee to Access State Government Organization | CISA). Each unnecessary account is an opportunity for attackers. Similarly, monitor active admin accounts for unusual access patterns – if an account that usually lies idle suddenly logs in from abroad at 2 AM, you want to know and act quickly.
  • Invest in Training and Incident Response Plans: Ensure that even privileged users receive ongoing security awareness training, including how to spot phishing and the importance of safeguarding credentials. Executives should also ask: If an admin account were compromised, do we have the monitoring in place to detect it and a plan to respond rapidly? Tabletop exercises and robust incident response playbooks are critical. In several cases above, attackers lurked for days or weeks before discovery. Speedy detection and response can significantly limit damage.

 

By executing on these key actions, organizations can dramatically reduce the odds that a single password or admin account will be the domino that topples their defenses. The cost of implementing strong authentication and access controls is far less than the cost of cleaning up a breach.

 

Conclusion

 

High-profile breaches in the last year make one thing clear: privileged account management is a business-critical issue. When an admin account is compromised due to weak controls, attackers gain the “keys to the kingdom” and the fallout can hit finances, operations, and reputation hard. Conversely, companies that proactively tighten their controls – enforcing MFA, using strong unique credentials, minimizing admin access, and protecting those credentials – are far less likely to become a headline for the wrong reasons. As an executive, championing these measures is not just supporting IT best practices, it’s safeguarding the entire enterprise. The incidents we’ve discussed are sobering, but they also highlight a hopeful message: with the right controls in place, these breaches were avoidable. Reducing your attack surface today means fewer fires to fight tomorrow. It’s time to ensure that your organization’s most powerful accounts are also its most secure.

Sources:

 

  1. CISA Advisory – Threat Actor Leverages Compromised Account of Former Employee (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account) (U.S. State Government Network Breached via Former Employee’s Account)
  2. BleepingComputer – Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA) (Change Healthcare hacked using stolen Citrix account with no MFA)
  3. Channel Insider – MFA Mandate: Snowflake Doubles Down Amid Attacks (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency) (Snowflake Data Breach Sparks MFA Enforcement Urgency)
  4. TechTarget News – Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget) (Microsoft: Legacy account hacked by Russian APT had no MFA | TechTarget)
  5. The Hacker News – Microsoft Confirms Russian Hackers Stole Source Code (Microsoft Confirms Russian Hackers Stole Source Code, Some Customer Secrets)
  6. CISA Best Practices – Actions to take to mitigate malicious activity (Threat Actor Leverages Compromised Account of Former Employee to Access State Government Organization | CISA)
  7. Specops 2024 Breached Password Report () (common weak admin passwords)
  8. Push Security – Public breaches from identity attacks in 2024 (Public breaches from identity attacks in 2024)

Password(s) in the wild...

In today's digital age, protecting your online identity and personal information has become more crucial than ever. Cyber threats are continually evolving, and one of the most effective ways to safeguard yourself against these risks is by practicing excellent password hygiene. Here's why it matters and what steps you can take to ensure your passwords are strong and secure.

 

Why Password Hygiene Matters

 

Every day, cybercriminals attempt to exploit weak passwords to gain unauthorized access to sensitive personal, financial, and professional information. According to Verizon’s 2023 Data Breach Investigations Report, compromised passwords account for 81% of hacking-related breaches. Poor password practices can lead to identity theft, financial losses, and even damage to your reputation. Adopting robust password habits drastically reduces your vulnerability and helps ensure your digital safety.

 

Essential Password Hygiene Practices

 

1. Regularly Change Your Passwords

The Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recommends periodically updating passwords—every three to six months—to reduce the likelihood of breaches due to compromised credentials.

 

2. Minimum 15-Character Passwords

According to research from Microsoft, passwords with 15 or more characters significantly increase the difficulty for automated tools to crack passwords, making longer passwords exponentially more secure than shorter ones.

 

3. Avoid Using Personal Details

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) advises against using easily guessable personal details such as birthdays, anniversaries, pet names, or addresses in passwords, as cybercriminals often harvest these details from social media profiles.

 

4. Unique Passwords for Every Login

According to a Google study, 52% of users reuse the same password across multiple accounts. This practice significantly increases vulnerability, as one compromised account can expose all others.

 

5. Leverage a Password Manager

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) advocates using password managers, as these tools help generate strong, unique passwords and securely store your login information, greatly simplifying password management while enhancing security.

 

Conclusion

 

Adopting robust password hygiene isn't merely a recommendation; it's essential in our increasingly interconnected world. Regularly updating passwords, using complex and lengthy passwords, avoiding personal details, creating unique passwords for every login, and employing a password manager can significantly enhance your digital security.

Protect your digital identity today—make excellent password hygiene a non-negotiable part of your online life.

EDITORIAL

written: March 18, 2025

AI PII Privacy Risks

In today’s digital age, artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly mainstream, shaping everything from how we search online to how we interact with technology daily. However, as AI grows more prevalent, concerns about privacy, particularly regarding personally identifiable information (PII), have emerged as critical issues that users must understand.

 

Mainstream AI tools, such as conversational AI assistants (e.g., ChatGPT, Google Bard) and generative AI platforms (e.g., Midjourney, DALL-E), rely heavily on data gathered from the internet. These AI models are trained using massive datasets, including text from websites, social media, forums, and publicly available records. For instance, Clearview AI, a facial recognition startup, was trained using billions of images scraped from social media and websites, raising significant privacy concerns (Source: The New York Times, 2020).

 

Consequently, each interaction users have with AI—each query, request, or conversation—can potentially become part of future training datasets. In 2023, a significant privacy incident occurred when Samsung employees unintentionally leaked proprietary company information by inputting sensitive corporate data into ChatGPT, demonstrating how easily private information can become vulnerable (Source: TechCrunch, 2023).

 

When users input personally identifiable information (names, addresses, phone numbers, emails, or sensitive details like financial or health information), they risk embedding their private data within AI’s expansive dataset. This data could inadvertently resurface in future interactions, leading to unintended privacy breaches or misuse.

 

Moreover, mainstream AI companies typically retain user queries to refine their models continuously. Even when anonymization is promised, the depth and specificity of personal data in user queries can sometimes defeat anonymization techniques, especially when aggregated with vast amounts of additional information available online.

 

The risks of sharing PII with AI include:

 

Identity Theft: Unintended exposure of sensitive personal data can make individuals vulnerable to identity theft or targeted phishing attacks.

 

Data Misuse and Breaches: Once personal data becomes embedded in AI datasets, the potential for misuse by third parties or exposure through security breaches dramatically increases.

 

Loss of Control Over Personal Data: Users may unknowingly relinquish control of their information once entered into an AI query, losing the ability to manage or delete it effectively.

 

Zero Trust Identity Best Practices

Integrating zero trust principles into your AI interactions can significantly enhance privacy and security. Zero trust is a security framework that requires continuous verification, explicitly validating every interaction, and minimizing access privileges.

 

Here are detailed zero trust identity best practices users and organizations can follow:

 

Enforce Continuous Authentication:

Utilize advanced methods such as adaptive authentication, biometrics, or behavioral analytics to continuously verify user identities.

Example: Companies like Okta and Duo Security offer adaptive authentication that evaluates contextual signals such as location, device health, and behavior patterns (Source: Gartner, 2022).

 

Least Privilege Access:

Limit access rights strictly to necessary resources required for each interaction, minimizing exposure.

Example: Microsoft Azure’s Conditional Access policies restrict user access based on defined conditions, significantly lowering risk (Source: Microsoft, 2023).

 

Micro-Segmentation:

Divide resources into isolated segments to limit lateral movement if an account is compromised.

Example: VMware’s NSX platform applies micro-segmentation to ensure network isolation and reduced risk exposure in case of breaches (Source: VMware, 2023).

 

Monitor and Audit Regularly:

Continuously monitor and log all AI interactions, regularly auditing logs to identify unusual patterns or breaches.

Example: Splunk’s platform provides robust log management and real-time analytics to detect suspicious activities (Source: Splunk, 2023).

 

Implement Strong Identity Governance:

Establish rigorous identity governance practices, clearly defining and managing user roles, permissions, and lifecycle.

Example: SailPoint offers comprehensive identity governance solutions ensuring accurate role assignments and controlled user access (Source: SailPoint, 2023).

 

To mitigate these risks and securely leverage AI, users should integrate both personal privacy practices and zero trust principles into their regular online interactions. Understanding how AI models are trained, the implications of sharing personal data, and proactively adopting these protective measures will enable individuals and organizations to enjoy the benefits of AI without compromising their security.

EDITORIAL:

written: March 30, 2025

The Hidden Dangers of AI in Receipts and Identity Workflows

EDITORIAL:

written: April 16, 2025

Introduction

 

From self-generating invoices to automated ID verification, AI is quickly becoming a foundational tool in business operations, security protocols, and digital transactions. Organizations use AI to process documents, detect anomalies, and streamline workflows—boosting speed and reducing human error. But there's a darker side.

 

When these systems are deployed without adequate oversight, they can be exploited by threat actors or produce flawed outcomes at scale. This blog post explores how AI-generated receipts and identity automation can lead to data fraud, compliance violations, and systemic vulnerabilities—especially in the absence of human checks and balances. We'll examine real-world examples of deepfake attacks, biased verification systems, and AI-forged documents to shed light on why these issues demand urgent attention.

 

This is the first of a two-part series that equips readers with both awareness and a path forward. Let's start with the risks.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing modern life, bringing unparalleled convenience and efficiency to everything from shopping to healthcare to cybersecurity. However, when AI is deployed in critical domains like financial documentation and identity management, the stakes are far higher. In particular, the use of AI-generated receipts and AI-automated identity workflows presents profound risks when human oversight is minimized or completely absent.

 

 

The Rise of AI in Receipts and Identity Workflows

 

AI’s adoption in everyday business processes has grown exponentially in recent years, particularly in the realms of financial documentation and identity verification. With a focus on speed, accuracy, and scalability, companies are turning to AI-driven tools for tasks that were traditionally manual and error-prone.

 

In finance, AI is now being used to:

  • Auto-generate purchase receipts from scanned documents, digital transactions, and even verbal confirmations using natural language processing.
  • Reconcile financial statements and generate expense reports without human intervention.
  • Detect anomalies in invoices and flag potential fraud faster than traditional systems.

In identity and access management (IAM), AI technologies help:

  • Authenticate users via biometric recognition (face, voice, fingerprint) using trained machine learning models.
  • Analyze documents (like driver’s licenses or passports) for verification during onboarding processes.
  • Make real-time decisions about user access, privileges, and policy enforcement across IT ecosystems.

These capabilities can deliver considerable benefits—improving user experiences, reducing workload, and cutting costs. However, the speed of implementation often outpaces the necessary risk analysis. Many organizations introduce these tools without robust safeguards, failing to account for how AI can be misled, manipulated, or make incorrect decisions without human validation.

 

As the complexity of these systems increases, so does their vulnerability—particularly in areas where high-value transactions or sensitive personal information are involved. The ease with which AI can scale also means any mistake, bias, or exploitation isn’t isolated—it’s amplified across entire networks or customer bases.  This context sets the stage for the more pressing concern: the inherent and emerging dangers of deploying AI in critical business functions without adequate oversight, which we explore in the next section.

 

AI technologies are now widely used for:

  • Generating purchase receipts from scanned documents or system logs
  • Automating expense reporting and financial reconciliation
  • Performing biometric and document-based identity verification
  • Managing user access and roles in enterprise IT environments

These applications promise increased efficiency and lower operational costs. However, their integration often happens faster than organizations can assess and mitigate the associated risks.

 

Dangers of AI-Generated Receipts

 

AI-generated receipts are becoming commonplace in accounting systems, expense management platforms, and e-commerce workflows. While they offer the benefit of automation, they also present unique vulnerabilities that threat actors are learning to exploit. The following subsections detail specific categories of risk tied to the use of AI in receipt generation and processing.

 

Fake Receipts and Financial Fraud

 

Generative AI tools, including text-to-image models and document generators, can produce fraudulent receipts that look nearly identical to legitimate ones. These receipts can include precise formatting, merchant logos, timestamps, and realistic item descriptions. Such forgeries can be used to inflate business expense reports, commit insurance fraud, or deceive accounting systems into issuing reimbursements or tax deductions based on fictitious transactions.

 

What makes AI-generated fraud particularly dangerous is its scalability. Fraudsters can mass-produce counterfeit receipts with minimal effort, making it difficult for human auditors to catch every falsified document. Even AI models used for validation can be deceived by other AI-generated content if they lack advanced fraud detection logic.

 

According to PwC’s Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey, 42% of companies reported experiencing some form of fraud, with a growing proportion involving digital manipulation. This highlights the need for rigorous controls, even in seemingly routine operations like receipt processing.

 

Tax and Regulatory Non-Compliance

 

In environments where receipts are automatically submitted and categorized without human oversight, AI errors can lead to serious tax reporting inaccuracies. For instance, an AI model might misread a scanned receipt, categorize a personal purchase as a business expense, or even fabricate details if trained improperly.

 

Such inaccuracies may result in:

  • Overstated or understated deductions
  • Incorrect financial statements
  • Regulatory penalties during audits

In industries bound by strict compliance standards, this could lead to reputational harm or legal liability. Furthermore, regulatory agencies may start demanding explainability and traceability in AI systems used for financial reporting.

 

Trust Degradation

 

The fundamental purpose of a receipt is to serve as proof of a transaction. When AI systems can fabricate such documentation with extreme realism, the concept of a "receipt" as a trustworthy source of truth begins to erode. This undermines confidence not only in internal operations but also in external audits, vendor relationships, and financial disclosures.

 

Watermarks, metadata, and even QR codes that once provided a layer of authenticity are now easily replicated. The burden of proving authenticity is shifting back onto humans—who must question whether what they’re seeing is real.

 

This loss of inherent trust has broad implications: it complicates verification workflows, adds audit overhead, and could ultimately reduce confidence in digital financial systems unless strong safeguards are put in place.

 

If organizations automate receipt generation without proper verification, they risk submitting inaccurate tax documents. AI may misinterpret scanned data or falsely generate entries, leading to compliance issues and financial penalties.

 

Perils of AI-Automated Identity Workflows

 

As organizations increasingly rely on AI to verify identities and manage access rights, the risks associated with automation become more complex. AI-based identity verification systems promise speed and scale—but also inherit critical flaws that make them susceptible to manipulation, bias, and attack. These systems often operate with limited visibility and rely on data-driven decisions that may lack nuance, context, or the ability to catch edge cases that a human reviewer would flag.

 

The following subsections illustrate key dangers inherent to AI-powered identity workflows.

 

Deepfake Exploits

 

Biometric authentication powered by AI—such as facial recognition, voice recognition, and behavioral biometrics—has become a common method of verifying identity. But these systems can be deceived by deepfake technology: AI-generated audio, video, or image content that mimics real individuals with alarming accuracy.

 

Attackers can now create convincing videos that replicate a person’s facial expressions, voice tone, and even lip movements. In 2023, a Hong Kong firm was tricked into transferring $25 million after cybercriminals used a deepfake video of their CFO in a fabricated video call, convincing a junior employee that the request was legitimate.

 

Such attacks highlight the fact that visual confirmation is no longer a reliable safeguard. Even sophisticated systems may struggle to detect subtle indicators of deepfake manipulation without added layers of verification and anomaly detection. This makes the need for robust multi-factor verification—especially with a human-in-the-loop—more critical than ever.

 

Biased and Opaque Decision-Making

 

AI identity workflows often rely on training data to evaluate who a person is and what access they should have. But when that training data reflects social or demographic biases, the AI can replicate and amplify them—without any awareness of doing so.

 

This is especially dangerous in systems used for hiring, background checks, or granting access to sensitive data. For example, facial recognition algorithms have been shown to perform significantly worse on women and people of color. MIT Media Lab’s Gender Shades project revealed that some commercial facial recognition systems had error rates of up to 35% for Black women, compared to less than 1% for white men.

 

Without visibility into how these decisions are made—so-called "black box" AI—users are left with little recourse if they’re wrongly denied access or flagged as suspicious. Worse, organizations may remain unaware that discriminatory outcomes are occurring, since the algorithms can appear to be functioning correctly on the surface.

 

Scalable Identity Theft

 

One of the more insidious uses of AI in cybercrime is its ability to automate identity theft on a massive scale. AI-powered bots can be trained to conduct credential stuffing attacks—using leaked or stolen username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access to accounts. Once inside, these bots can impersonate users, reset security questions, exfiltrate data, or escalate privileges—all within seconds.

 

In automated identity workflows, the absence of human review means these intrusions can go undetected for long periods. AI systems designed to trust verified credentials or behavioral patterns can be spoofed, particularly if they rely solely on machine-learning models to judge legitimacy.

 

The 2023 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report noted that while 74% of breaches still involved human error, the increasing use of AI by bad actors is changing the equation—removing the need for phishing or social engineering and making attacks faster, more accurate, and harder to trace.

Without stronger identity governance and oversight, organizations risk making it easier—not harder—for identity theft to succeed at scale.

 

© Copyright 2025. All rights reserved.

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.